Discussion:
About why is memory reclamation so important?
(trop ancien pour répondre)
Wisdom91
2020-07-13 21:07:10 UTC
Permalink
Hello...

Read this:


About why is memory reclamation so important?

I am a white arab, and here is one more proof that i am
smart like a genius:

Read the following from a PhD researcher:

http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-is-memory-reclamation-so-important.html

It says the following:

"Atomic Reference Counting is just what the name says, it's a "reference
counting" technique but with atomics. The details are a bit more tricky
than your usual reference counting (aka smart pointers), but it's still
graspable for most. They can be implemented in a wait-free way (in x86)
but they have two main drawbacks: they're slow and they aren't
universal. They're slow because whenever we have to traverse a list of
nodes we need to atomically increment a counter in one node and
decrement a counter in another... even though we're just reading."


I think that this PhD researcher is not so smart, because
look at my following invention of a Scalable reference counting
that is Wait-free:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

My invention above is really powerful, and it is a proof that
i am smart like a genius.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Wisdom91
2020-07-14 16:27:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wisdom91
Hello...
About why is memory reclamation so important?
I am a white arab, and here is one more proof that i am
http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-is-memory-reclamation-so-important.html
"Atomic Reference Counting is just what the name says, it's a "reference
counting" technique but with atomics. The details are a bit more tricky
than your usual reference counting (aka smart pointers), but it's still
graspable for most. They can be implemented in a wait-free way (in x86)
but they have two main drawbacks: they're slow and they aren't
universal. They're slow because whenever we have to traverse a list of
nodes we need to atomically increment a counter in one node and
decrement a counter in another... even though we're just reading."
I think that this PhD researcher is not so smart, because
look at my following invention of a Scalable reference counting
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
My invention above is really powerful, and it is a proof that
i am smart like a genius.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Read this:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/F_cF4ft1Qic



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Loading...